USPTO serial 77451660
TOTALP1NP IS THE 1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOTALP1NP IS THE 1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
68305 Mannheim, DE
68305 Mannheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Michael Young
D. MICHAEL YOUNG ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC.9115 HAGUE RDINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256-1045UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roche Diagnostics GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Roche Diagnostics GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named TOTALP1NP IS THE 1
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |