Drawing for ESIC

USPTO serial 77452077

ESIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ESIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan S. Nemes

Alan S. Nemes Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP190 Carondelet PlazaSuite 600Saint Louis, MO 63105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic controllers and remote controllers for home automation; switches, namely, wireless, dimmer, light, appliance, thermo sensitive, photosensitive, socket, plug, motion sensitive and timer; electronic energy management system comprising wireless and wired electric measuring device, electronic energy meters and display device for measuring, calculating and displaying energy consumption; heating ventilation air-conditioning remote control system comprising wireless and wired electronic thermostats and thermo sensitive controllers for remotely monitoring and controlling home heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment; internet based control system comprising wireless and wired electric and electronic home automation devices, controllers, internet and ethernet connection gateway, computer and compatible system based software and program for monitoring, displaying, programming, communicating and controlling home automation equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 21, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 21, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 27, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance