Drawing for MERRIMACK HALL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER

USPTO serial 77452144

MERRIMACK HALL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERRIMACK HALL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank M. Caprio

Frank M. Caprio Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP200 Clinton Avenue WestSuite 900Huntsville, AL 35801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of live music concerts; Choreographic theatrical and musical floor shows provided at performance venues; Educational training services, namely, conducting classes in the field of music, theater, and choreographic theater productionsACTIVEOct 25, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 23, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 23, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 14, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 14, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 3, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 3, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance