USPTO serial 77452160
LESSTIGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LESSTIGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Des Plaines, IL
Des Plaines, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James P. Muraff
JAMES P. MURAFF NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLP2 N LASALLE ST STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60602-3882UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, brand, name, and trademark design strategy services; brand activation services, namely, providing the services of bringing a brand, name and trademark to life through creating brand experience for businesses in the nature of brand development services in all business fields; brand analytics and research services, namely, services relating to the analysis, evaluation, creation and brand establishment of trademarks, trade names and domain names; brand architecture services, namely, brand imagery consulting services for businesses; brand innovation services, namely, providing marketing and consultancy services for developing brands, names and trademarks for businesses through new marketing ideas; brand internalization services, namely, providing brand, name, and trademark services relating to identifying brands, names, and trademarks which fit a particular business and/or its goods and/or its services in the nature of management and marketing of brands for businesses; brand management and stewardship services in the nature of managing and tracking the brands, names, and trademarks of a business related to the use of such brands, names, and trademarks on packaging, advertising and other forms of communication of such brands, names, and trademarks to the consuming public, namely, computerized database management, and compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; assisting businesses in creating compelling experiences and ways for securing increased return in the use of such brands, names, and trademarks, namely, brand concept and brand development services for corporate clients; brand standards services, namely, assisting businesses in using brands, names, and trademarks in a consistent manner and in a manner which will build a strong brand, name, and trademark; environmental branding services, namely, discovery, research, and analysis of business marketing situations and conducting an in-depth study of marketing project goals and objectives; identity development services, namely, creating corporate and brand identity for businesses; naming and nomenclature services, namely, relating to the analysis, evaluation, creation and brand establishment of trademarks, trade names and domain names; and, print collateral design services, namely, design of advertising materials for businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Photography services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product development services; retail design services, namely, planning and layout design for the interior space of retail business establishments; production art services, namely, commercial and graphic art design; brand packaging and system design services, namely, providing professional experience, industry knowledge, and cutting-edge technology in the design of packaging, containers, shipping fixtures, and packing supplies for businesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schawk, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Schawk, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LESSTIGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |