USPTO serial 77452539
CROCMEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROCMEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Yarra Victoria, AU
South Yarra Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Public relations and publicity services; preparation of publicity materials for others, namely, writing of publicity texts; product launch services for others, namely, promoting the goods, services, brand identity, personalities and commercial information and news of third parties through print, audio, video, digital and on-line mediums, all for the purpose of generating publicity; promotional services, namely, providing launch parties to introduce and promote the goods and services of others, all for the purpose of generating publicity; advertising services; online advertising services; advertising services, namely, arranging for the placement of advertisements for third parties; production of radio, television, cinema and online commercials; consulting services, namely, media consultancy services advising clients how much media and at what times the client would be purchasing advertising; consulting services, namely, media consultancy services advising clients how to interact with the media in order to gain the best exposure for the clients' goods and services; public relations and advertising consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, organizing and arranging an array of live entertainment events, namely, live sporting and athletic events, namely, cricket, football, soccer, basketball and baseball, live dance performances, live musical performances, live radio personality performances, live stage performances, live fashion shows, live appearances by professional entertainers, celebrities, athletes and authors, live exhibitions and entertainment conferences in the fields of sports, entertainment, fashion and culture; provision of information relating to live entertainment, fashion, sports and culture; news agency services, namely, dissemination of sports news and sports related entertainment information; entertainment services, namely, production of television and radio shows; multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music and electronic publications; providing sports information in the fields of cricket, football, soccer, basketball and baseball by means of telephone prerecorded messages and online; entertainment services, namely, providing score results from sporting events, namely, cricket, football, soccer, basketball and baseball | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of intellectual property, namely, licensing the use of photographs and journal and magazine articles for use and publication by third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crocmedia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Crocmedia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CROCMEDIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |