USPTO serial 77453010
B BILLSTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B BILLSTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ciudad del Este, PY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROPO BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Anti-theft alarms for vehicles; Reversing alarms for vehicles; Shock absorbing springs for vehicles; Shock absorbers for vehicles; Bands for wheel hubs; Bicycle rims; Rims for vehicle wheels; Seat Covers or vehicles; Automobiles; Treads for retreading tires; Horns for vehicles; Hub caps; Lorries; Trucks; Covers for vehicle steering wheels; Cars; Motor cars; Goods handling carts; Sports cars; Carts; Safety belts for vehicle seats; Repair outfits for inner tubes; Balance weights for vehicle wheels; Adhesive rubber patches for repairing inner tubes; Inner tubes for bicycles, cycles; Inner tubes for pneumatic tires; Anti-dazzle devices for vehicles; Anti-glare devices for vehicles; Hubs for vehicle wheels; Axles for vehicles; Fork lift trucks; Lifting cars; Rearview mirrors; Spoke clips for wheels; Upholstery for vehicles; Brakes for vehicles; Casings for pneumatic tires; Brake linings for vehicles; Direction signals for vehicles; Vehicle suspension springs; Motorcycles; Engines for land vehicles; Motors for land vehicles; Pneumatic tires; Non-skid devices for vehicle tires; Automobile tires; Bicycle tires; Tires for bicycles and cycles; Tires for vehicle wheels; Tubeless tires for bicycles and cycles, Tires, solid, for vehicle wheels; Windscreen wipers; Windshield wipers; Windscreens; Windshields; Vehicle bumpers; Bumpers for automobiles; Vehicle wheel spokes; Dress guards for bicycles, cycles; Bands for wheel hubs; Mine cart wheels; Vehicle wheels; Freewheels for land vehicles; Treads for vehicles; Treads for vehicles; Caravans; Trailers; Tractors; Vehicle chassis; Vehicle seats; Steering wheels for vehicles; Valves for vehicle tires; Omnibuses; Coaches; Motor buses; Transmission chains for land vehicles; Transmission shafts for land vehicles; Safety Blocker for vehicles; piece of rubber for vehicle pedals; axis of motor vehicles; covers for vehicles; electrical equipment for adjusting the rear view mirror; vehicle exhaust; mirror for vehicles; signal lights for vehicles; oil and fuel filters for vehicle; rubber to fix tires; Noise reducer for vehicles; fiber and plastics spoilers for cars; ignition parts for cars; glass for vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |