USPTO serial 77453189
AECJOBSTORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AECJOBSTORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Zeman
LAURA J. ZEMAN SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.1 ARIZONA CENTER 400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing on-line job placement services, namely, testing to determine job competency and resume matching services via a global computer network; organizing and conducting job fairs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |