USPTO serial 77454363
POKER ZITRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3789121Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2010
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POKER ZITRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles W. Fallow
Charles W. Fallow Davis & Bujold, P.L.L.C.112 Pleasant StreetConcord, NH 03301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gaming devices, namely, gaming machines, slot machines, bingo machines, with or without video output; computer software and firmware for games of chance on any computerized platform, including dedicated gaming consoles, video based slot machines, reel based slot machines, and video lottery terminals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZITRO IP S.AR.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Monoscoop, B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Monoscoop, B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Monoscoop, B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named POKER ZITRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 18, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |