USPTO serial 77454510
TAZAKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAZAKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20045-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fish; seafoods; mixtures of squid and yam; preserved and canned fruit, nuts, vegetables, mushrooms, chestnuts, and bamboo shoots; laver; preserved, dried, frozen, cooked or processed edible seaweeds and kelp; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; snack foods, namely, potato croquettes; desserts and preparations for making desserts, namely, ice cream, soya-based cakes and soya based cake ingredients; edible oils; beef stock, chicken stock, fish stock, veal stock; instant soups; unflavored and unsweetened gelatins; soy bean paste; garlic-based spread, yam paste, fish paste, plum paste; pickled radishes, pickled plums, pickled vegetables; soy bean products, namely, processed soy beans, soy bean oil, soy based snack foods; seaweed products, namely, dried edible seaweed, processed edible seaweed; processed fermented soy beans, bean curd; but not including dates | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Noodles; spaghetti; rice; flour; bread, food starch; mixes for making batter; breadcrumbs; sugar; tea; confectionery and sweets, namely, candies; chewing gum; chocolate; ice cream mixes; custard powder; desserts and preparations for making desserts, namely, ice cream, soya-based cakes and soya based cake ingredients; snack products, namely, soya based snack food, rice based snack food, wheat based snack food, corn based snack food, potato based snack food; roasted and ground sesame seeds; crackers, biscuits, rice cakes; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; sauces and sauce mixes; baking powder, baking soda; salt, pepper; mustard; vinegar; soy sauce; derivatives of vinegar and of soy sauce; dressings; salad dressing; spices, processed herbs, seasonings, including sauce based-seasonings; dumplings; horseradish paste and ginger paste, pickled ginger; Non-alcoholic drinks, namely, coffee and tea based cold drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; beers; lager | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, sake, cooking wine, plum wine, distilled spirits, prepared alcoholic cocktails | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tazaki Foods Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Tazaki Foods Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named TAZAKI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |