USPTO serial 77454735
TOOL RULE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOOL RULE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hoffman Estates, IL
Hoffman Estates, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark R. Galis
Mark R. Galis Greenberg Traurig, LLP77 W. Wacker DriveSuite 3100Chicago, IL 60601-1732Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated tools and items in the form of gas, electric, battery or cordless power, namely, drills, hammer drills, impact wrenches, planers, circular saws, industrial tool grinders, bench saws, jig saws, chain saws, belts for machines, orbital sanders, rotary sanders, routers, electric generators, water well pumps, sump pumps, hydraulic jacks, portable drills and saws, portable hand sanders and polishers, air compressors and sprayers, and accessories for air compressors, namely, air-operated paint guns and airless paint sprayer; hand held airless and compressed air paint sprayers; band saws; cylinder grinders | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, axes, chisels, files, hack saws, hand saws, hammers, hand hammers, hatchets, planes, pliers, adjustable end wrenches, adjustable socket wrenches, bit braces, cold chisels, hand wrenches, hack saw blades, hack saw frames, screwdrivers, tinners' snips, trowels, twist drills, metal vises, wood chisels, ratchet wrenches, pipe threaders, fret saws, bow saws, woodsmen's saws, dado saws, non-wood axe, hammer and hatchet handles, work arbors and chucks, pipe wrenches, pipe cutters, punches, pinch and pry bars, coping saws, torque wrenches, putty knives, plasterers' trowels, post hole augers, nail sets, cylinder wall ridge reamers, expansion reamers, gear pullers, taper reamers, chalk line reel and line, circle cutters, stud removers, flaring tools and tubing sold therewith, gasket cutters, piston ring compressors, piston groove cutters, brushing punches, bushing driver tools in the nature of drivers and bushings used in the installation of seals, bearings and bushings in automobiles, lever jaw wrenches, bolt cutters, mechanic's inspection mirrors, rubber mallets, file holders, brake spring pliers, spring spreaders, tie rod spreaders, mauls, utility knives and blades, steel cradle hammer and hatchet holders, sledges, splitting wedges, nail pullers and bars, mattocks, punches, straight cut and duckbill tin snips, manual cutting tin snips, shaping planes, shaping files, round shaping files, tap and die sets, tote shovels; mechanics' hand tools, namely, socket wrenches, socket sets, ratchet wrenches, spinner handles for socket wrenches, extension bars, combination wrenches, ignition wrenches, hex key wrenches, hacksaws, universal joints, carpenter squares, tool holsters, tool ring holders, tool holders in the nature of work aprons, lug wrenches, spring clamps, drain augers, bar clamps | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Rulers, namely, graduated rulers, folding rulers, tape rulers and yardsticks; non-electric wall stud finders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sears Brands, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sears Brands, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TOOL RULE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |