USPTO serial 77454746
OUR QUALITY IS AT YOUR FINGERTIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUR QUALITY IS AT YOUR FINGERTIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. Johnson
Sean D. Johnson INGRASSIA, FISHER, & LORENZ, P.C.7010 E. Cochise Rd.Scottsdale, AZ 85253UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Biometric security products, namely, fingerprint sensor hardware and software, user manuals and other documentation sold as a unit, namely, Fingerprint sensors and other types of biometric sensors sold as separate peripheral devices or as component devices to be installed in and/or integrated in other devices, namely, laptop and desktop computers, mobile telephones, personal electronic devices, and other devices to provide biometric and fingerprint identification for access authorization sold as a unit with delivered products; fingerprint authentication hardware and software for use with information, communication, and entertainment devices; and hardware and software for enabling access to personal information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |