USPTO serial 77454766
QUESTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUESTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Franklin Rothwell
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND OFFICE FUNCTIONS; MARKET OPINION POLLING STUDIES; ONLINE BUSINESS RESEARCH SERVICE THAT ALLOWS THE USER TO ANALYZE OPINION TRENDS CONTAINED IN DOCUMENTS ON THE INTERNET; COMPANY MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING CONSULTANCY IN DEMOGRAPHIC MATTERS; CREATION OF MARKETING TOOLS DESIGNED TO INCREASE A CLIENT COMPANY'S KNOWLEDGE OF CUSTOMER NEEDS, AND ITS COMPETITORS' PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, PRICING, ADVERTISING STRATEGY AND SALES STRATEGY; CORPORATE IMAGE CONSULTING SERVICES; DEMOGRAPHIC STUDIES; DEVELOPMENT OF MARKETING STRATEGIES AND CONCEPTS; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS STRATEGIES AND CREATIVE IDEATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ANALYSIS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION CONSULTANCY; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; URBAN PLANNING; DESIGN AND TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; SURVEY DESIGN AND RESEARCH; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSES; INDUSTRIAL DESIGN; CIVIL ENGINEERING; RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF CHEMICALS; NAVAL BIO-ENERGETIC RESEARCH; DESIGN OF EQUIPMENT FOR ASTRONAUTS; QUALITY CONTROL FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, HOSTING AND MAINTAINING AN ONLINE WEB SITE FOR OTHERS FOR THE SHARING OF INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER NEEDS, MARKETING, BUSINESS QUALITY, NEEDS AND DEMANDS OF INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |