USPTO serial 77455358
NEAR-DECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEAR-DECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jefferson F. Scher
JEFFERSON F. SCHER CARR & FERRELL LLP2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303-3322UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services; insertion of ads for others into audio, video, and other media and applications; provision of ad performance tracking and reporting services; provision of ad-targeting metadata including user profile and content context information; marketing and monetization services; provision of marketing and monetization services to developers of audio, video, and other media and applications; provision of billing and transaction settlement services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | provision of audio, video, and other media and applications in electronic formats; distribution for others of audio, video, and other media and applications in electronic formats; aggregation of audio, video, and other media and applications in electronic formats for distribution by others; provision of audio, video, and other media and applications for consumption on handheld and mobile devices; distribution for others of audio, video, and other media and applications for consumption on handheld and mobile devices; provision of search engines and other discovery tools in the field of audio, video, and other media and applications; provision of suggestions and recommendations in the field of audio, video, and other media and applications; provision of filtering, ranking, and other user feedback-based tools in the field of audio, video, and other media and applications; provision of policy-based content filtering and management tools and services; providing computer software for making audio, video, and other media interoperable with content distribution networks; providing developers of audio, video, and other media and applications services for signing and authenticating such media to assign and recognize the relationship between developers and their media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |