Drawing for LIGHTS OUT DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 77455678

LIGHTS OUT DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHTS OUT DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

April Wurster

April Wurster Baker and McKenzie12544 High Bluff DriveThird FloorSAN DIEGO, CA 92130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Real estate developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance