USPTO serial 77455934
MYBLUECONNECT@BIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYBLUECONNECT@BIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL H. KOCHANSKI
PAUL H. KOCHANSKI LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ, & MENTLIK, LL600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | WIRELESS TELEPHONE AND INTERNET SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TELEPHONE ACCESS AND INTERNET ACCESS VIA WIRELESS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |