USPTO serial 77456071
I INDULGE "EVERYBODY NEEDS A LITTLE INDULGE!"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2011
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with I INDULGE "EVERYBODY NEEDS A LITTLE INDULGE!"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
Rogers, AR
Other trademarks owned by Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
Rogers, AR
Other trademarks owned by Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
Bentonville, AR
Other trademarks owned by Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Pieper
David B. Pieper Keisling & Pieper PLCP.O. Box 10379Fayetteville, AR 72703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FOODS IN THE NATURE OF PREPARED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES; CANNED, BAGGED, OR BOTTLED SLICED FRUITS; CUT FRUITS; DRIED FRUITS; FROZEN FRUITS; PROCESSED FRUITS; PROCESSED VEGETABLES; CUT VEGETABLES; VEGETABLE SALADS; CANNED, BAGGED, OR BOTTLED SLICED VEGETABLES; PROCESSED POTATOES; PROCESSED SWEET POTATOES; CHEESE; GARDEN SALADS, OR FRUIT SALADS; SOUPS; FROZEN, PACKAGED OR PREPARED APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF VEGETABLES, MEAT AND/OR CHEESE; DAIRY-BASED DIPS; AND SOUPS; DIPS; FROZEN, PREPARED OR PACKAGED SIDE ITEMS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES, NAMELY, PROCESSED SNOW PEAS, PROCESSED BROCCOLI, CREAMY STRING BEANS, BUTTERED ASPARAGUS, VEGETABLE MEDLEY, PROCESSED COLLARED GREENS, SPINACH AND ARTICHOKE DIP, TOMATO BASIL DIP, TUNA SALAD, MEATBALLS, CHICKEN CUBES, TURKEY CUBES, AND BEEF CUBES; FROZEN, PACKAGED OR PREPARED HORS D'OEUVRES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES | ACTIVE | May 18, 2008 |
| 030 | FOODS IN THE NATURE OF ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA OR RICE; BREAD; BISCUITS; FROZEN, PACKAGED OR PREPARED APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA, RICE, OR BREAD; PASTA SALAD; SANDWICHES; SIDE ITEMS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA, RICE, OR BREAD; FROZEN, PACKAGED OR PREPARED HORS D'OEUVRES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA, RICE, OR BREAD; FRESH AND FROZEN DESSERTS, NAMELY, COOKIES, CAKES, PIES, PUDDING, BREAD PUDDING, PETITS FOURS, BAKERY DESSERTS, AND FLAVORED AND SWEETENED GELATIN; CHOCOLATE; QUICHE; FOOD FLAVORINGS; SPICES; CANDY; TEA; COFFEE; AND SALSA | ACTIVE | May 18, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Indulge Brands Products & Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named I INDULGE "EVERYBODY NEEDS A LITTLE INDULGE!"
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |