Drawing for BIFLEX

USPTO serial 77457032

BIFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN E. TURUNG

BRIAN E TURUNG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVE5TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1843

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019ROOFING MATERIAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY A FILAMENT REINFORCED ROOFING MEMBRANE; BUILDING MATERIAL, NAMELY, MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING MEMBRANES AND MODIFIED BITUMEN MEMBRANES FOR USE ON THE SIDES OF HOUSES AND BUILDINGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 2, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 27, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance