Drawing for DO GOOD DO

USPTO serial 77457349

DO GOOD DO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DO GOOD DO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Daly Stearns

SUSAN DALY STEARNS GREENBERG TRAURIG2375 E CAMELBACK RD STE 700PHOENIX, AZ 85016-9000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, shirts and pantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance