USPTO serial 77457564
ROMAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROMAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London WC1V 7PB, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elise Tenen-Aoki
Elise Tenen-Aoki Kacvinsky Daisak pllc4500 Brooktree RoadSuite 302Wexford, PA 15090Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Welding and brazing machines; cutting and gouging machines; robotic welding and cutting machines; gears and gear boxes other than for land vehicles; work-piece handling machines and manipulators; machine tools; metalworking machines; machinery for rotating and positioning work-pieces when welding, brazing, cutting and gouging; turntable machines; motorized rollers for rotating cylindrical work-pieces when welding and cutting; manipulators; column and boom manipulators; manipulators for handling heavy materials; gantry welding machines; storage tank welding machines; automated roller beds; machines for manufacturing pipes; machines for handling pipes when welding and cutting; handling apparatus for loading and unloading; apparatus for machining; parts and fittings for the aforementioned machines | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |