Drawing for AMBR

USPTO serial 77457590

AMBR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMBR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose

Brad D. Rose Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cellular phones; carrying cases for cellular phones; cellular phone covers; cellular phone battery chargers; cellular phone accessory charms; downloadable graphics for cellular phones; downloadable ring tones and graphics for cellular phones; cellular phone accessories, namely, headsets, face plates, ear buds, batteries, battery chargers, power adapters, microphones, phone holsters and pouches, antennas, and phone cradles; personal digital assistants (PDAs), namely, electronic handheld units for the wireless receipt and/or transmission of data that enable the user to keep track of or manage personal information, featuring the capacity to transmit and receive voice communications; personal digital assistants (PDAs), namely, electronic handheld units for the wireless receipt and/or transmission of data that enable the user to keep track of or manage personal informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 12, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance