Drawing for NEW WAVE BALCONY

USPTO serial 77457977

NEW WAVE BALCONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW WAVE BALCONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Don J. Pelto

Don J. Pelto Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP1300 I Street NW11th Floor EastWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Arranging cruises; cruise ship services; travel, excursion and cruise arrangementACTIVEMar 18, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 25, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 25, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 8, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 22, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 21, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 21, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2009CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 29, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 29, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 11, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 11, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance