USPTO serial 77458347
ORZMAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORZMAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Paige
JAMES J. PAIGE NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A.900 2ND AVE S STE 820MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software to enable uploading posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging about, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communication network; design and development of multimedia products; research services in the field of information and telecommunications technology; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer software design for others; computer services, namely hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings and interactive discussions; rental of computers and software; providing technical information updates of industrial process control computer software via the global computer network; computer services, namely hosting and maintaining an online website for others to provide on-line information and upload on-line videos for entertainment purposes; design and development of on-line computer software systems; Providing technical information updates of industrial process control computer software via the global computer network; Computer systems analysis; Installation and maintenance of computer software; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; Computer virus protection services; Application service provider featuring software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports | ACTIVE | Apr 14, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |