USPTO serial 77459742
ALBERTSSON CONSULTING LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4154305Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2012
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALBERTSSON CONSULTING LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Tonawanda, NY
North Tonawanda, NY
Mayfield Heights, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Candace Lynn Bell, Esq.
Candace Lynn Bell, Esq. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC91 Jewett ParkwayThe Carriage HouseBuffalo, NY 14214Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services, namely, the identification, evaluation, development and succession of employees within a business organization; Business consulting services, namely, the development of a strategic plan, framework, method or process for the identification, evaluation, development and succession of employees within a business organization; Business consulting services, namely, the identification of competencies and experiences required for success of employees within a business organization; Business consulting services, namely, the design and development of programs, processes and tools to evaluate and develop individual employees' competencies and experiences within a business organization; Business consulting services, namely, the design and development of programs, processes and tools to identify, evaluate and develop high potential and key employees within a business organization; Business consulting services, namely, the design and development of programs, processes and tools to identify, evaluate and develop best suited candidates for positions within a business organization; Business consulting services, namely, the designing, developing, analyzing, evaluating and facilitating succession planning and succession management processes and tools within a business organization; Business consulting services, namely, the designing, developing and facilitating teambuilding exercises and events within a business organization | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 12, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Albertsson, Candice
- Other trademarks owned by Albertsson, Candice
- Other trademarks owned by Albertsson, Candice
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ALBERTSSON CONSULTING LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |