USPTO serial 77460001
STEVIATABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEVIATABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Noblitt
Daniel J. Noblitt The Noblitt Group, PLLC8800 N GAINEY CTR DRIVE, STE 279SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements; food supplements; nutritional supplements; mineral nutritional supplements; mineral supplements; dietary and nutritional supplements; dietary food supplements; food supplements, namely, antioxidants; herbal supplements; homeopathic supplements; nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; dietary food supplement for human consumption; nutritional additives for medical purposes for use in foods and dietary food supplements for human consumption; food for medically restricted diets; food for diabetics; meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; dietary supplemental drinks; dietary fiber as an additive for food products; all of the aforementioned goods containing stevia | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 2001 |
| 030 | Natural sweeteners containing stevia | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |