Drawing for VICKERY & CLARKE NATURAL APOTHECARY

USPTO serial 77460260

VICKERY & CLARKE NATURAL APOTHECARY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VICKERY & CLARKE NATURAL APOTHECARY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Ottaviani

JOHN E. OTTAVIANI EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLPPO BOX 130NEW YORK, NY 10150-0130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated cosmetics and skin care products, namely, bath milk, body wash, body scrub, body lotion, hand cream, eye cream, detoxifying facial mask, facial scrub, facial cleanser, facial moisturizer; anti-aging oil and wax based anhydrous lip treatment; non-medicated body soak; beauty serum, namely, vitamin serum; non-medicated skin care product, namely, lip treatment cream and lotion; detoxifying bath soak in salt form; therapeutic bath soak in powder form; therapeutic bath milk in liquid form; non-medicated cooling spray for foot and leg; non-medicated cooling foot cream; aromatics other than for medical purposes; pulse point balm in the nature of aromatherapy lotion; pillow mist, namely, aromatherapy sprayACTIVE—
021Bath products, namely, natural mesh body spongesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 10, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 10, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 2, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance