USPTO serial 77460623
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore L. Laufer
THEODORE L. LAUFER ATTORNEY AT LAW1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 1100LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4618UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts, Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tee shirts; Tank tops; Tops; Baseball caps; Caps with visors, all embodying the theme of The Bigfoot Lodge cocktail lounge, a kitschy, whimsical log cabin in the Pacific Northwest wilderness, home to the mythical or cryptozoological ape-like creature Bigfoot, and specifically excluding t-shirts, jerseys, jackets, caps and novelty items featuring a monster truck theme | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1999 |
| 028 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Toy snow globes (Based on Intent to Use) Bath toys; Battery operated action toys; Electronic action toys; Mechanical action toys; Pull toys; Stuffed toy animals; Stuffed toy bears; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy animals and accessories therefor; Toy figures; Toy furniture, all embodying the theme of The Bigfoot Lodge cocktail lounge, a kitschy, whimsical log cabin in the Pacific Northwest wilderness, home to the mythical or cryptozoological ape-like creature Bigfoot, and specifically excluding toy vehicles, toy vehicles having 4-wheel drive, and all toys, videotapes, photos, posters, novelties, novelty items and video games featuring a monster truck theme | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |