USPTO serial 77460822
HALO SCENES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HALO SCENES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo, Esq.
DANIEL M. CISLO, ESQ. CISLO & THOMAS LLP1333 2ND ST STE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-4100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network; Advertising, promotion and marketing services for providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network; Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network, namely, uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging and electronically transmitting information, audio, and video clips; providing access to information, audio, and video via websites, online forums, chat rooms, listservs and blogs over the Internet; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; Education and entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring audio clips, video clips, musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs, other multimedia materials, and information in the field of audio clips, video clips, musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; blogs featuring information in the field of audio clips, video clips, musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; and Application service provider (ASP) featuring software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |