USPTO serial 77461388
SEVENSTAR HARDCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEVENSTAR HARDCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C. SCOTT
JAMES C. SCOTT ROETZEL & ANDRESS1375 EAST NINTH STREET9TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's clothing and clothing accessories, namely, suits; coats; jackets; slacks; pants; sport coats; hats and caps; jeans; knit tops; pullovers; shirts; sweat shirts; t-shirts; sweaters; shorts; vests; woven tops; swim trunks; pajamas; nightshirts; robes; dressing gowns; ties; belts; hosiery; scarves; loungewear; namely, t-shirts; tank tops; overalls; coats; sports clothing; namely, training and warm-up suits; golf shirts; jackets and rain jackets; swimwear; ski suits; pants; mitts; gloves; hats; parkas; turtlenecks; women's clothing and clothing accessories, namely, coats; jackets; blazers; suits; ponchos; capes; stoles; boas; scarves; hats; veils; knit tops; dresses; gowns; gloves; blouses; jeans; pullovers; shirts; t-shirts; sweatshirts; tops; sweaters; skirts; shorts; culottes; jumpers; pants; overalls; woven tops; robes; dressing gowns; lingerie; negligees; nightgowns; pajamas; brassieres; girdles; corsets; garter belts; underwear; namely, panties; vests; slips; uniforms, scarves, shawls, bathing suits, loungewear, namely, lounging pajamas, caftans and jumpsuits; sports clothing; namely, training and warm-up suits; golf shirts; jackets; suits and rain jackets; swimwear; ski suits; pants; mitts; gloves; hats; parkas; turtlenecks and children's clothing, namely, coats; snow suits; blazers; knit tops; jackets; pants; shirts; blouses; sweaters; t-shirts; sweatshirts; shorts; coveralls; jeans; sun suits; vests; woven tops; bathing suits; bathing hats; swim trunks; hats and caps; mitts and gloves; ties; uniforms; suits; gowns; dresses; jumpers; suspenders; slips; skirts; culottes; crawlers; jump suits; rompers; scarves; sports clothing, namely, training and warm-up suits; jackets; suits and rain jackets; swimwear; ski suits; pants; mitts; gloves; hats; parkas; turtlenecks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |