CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BITE TV

USPTO serial 77462137

BITE TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BITE TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Becker

Jeffrey M. Becker Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory AvenueSuite 700Dallas, TX 75219-7673

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Broadcasting short video clips inside of restaurants; Broadcasting programs via a global computer networkACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing pre-recorded video, music, and news on-line via a global computer network in the fields of sports, music, current events, television and movies to restaurant patrons; Entertainment services, namely, providing video content in the nature of short video clips in the field of sports, music, news, comedy and dramaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 10, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 14, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance