Drawing for BRIGHTPOINT

USPTO serial 77462467

BRIGHTPOINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIGHTPOINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas H. Zellerbach & Stacy E. Don

THOMAS H. ZELLERBACH & STACY E. DON ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP4 PARK PLAZASUITE 1600, IP PROSECUTION DEPARTMENTIRVINE, CA 92614-2558

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Analysis of housing data, demographics data, and residential energy use data all relating to energy consumption patterns; generation of reports for others concerning residential energy consumption and conservation of energy; providing information and offers for products and services of others, all in the field of reducing energy consumption and energy conservation; providing an informational website in the field of energy consumption and energy conservationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance