Drawing for MOTHER KNOWS BEST

USPTO serial 77462592

MOTHER KNOWS BEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTHER KNOWS BEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sharon Blinkoff

SHARON BLINKOFF VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and advertisement, promotion and marketing services for clothing, leather goods, bags, back packs, flowers, dinnerwear, stationary, confectionery, coffee, tea, carbonated beverages, homegoods, pharmaceuticals and medicated products, cosmetics, toiletries, jewelry, toys and games, and for electronic media services and information providers over the Internet or other communications networks; Providing an online directory information service featuring a directory of blogs, a television series featuring games of chance, knowledge and skill, classifieds, virtual communities, social networking, photo sharing, and transmission of photographic images, all featuring information on the subject of games of chance, knowledge and skillACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, rendered through the media of television the internet, and any other communication network, namely, a television series featuring a game of chance and a game show involving knowledge and skill; Blogs featuring information regarding the television series and games of knowledge, skill and chanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 15, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 15, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 16, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 16, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance