USPTO serial 77462725
OCD (ORANGE COUNTY DISORDER)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OCD (ORANGE COUNTY DISORDER)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mission Viejo, CA
Mission Viejo, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Composition of music for others; Consultation and advice regarding musical selections and arrangements for sound recordings and live performances; Entertainment in the nature of an on-going special variety, news, music or comedy show featuring Orange County broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, namely, musical band, rock group, gymnastic, dance, and ballet performances; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; Entertainment services, namely, an online activity where you create your own music videos; Entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable ringtones, pre-recorded music, video and graphics presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of Orange County music; Entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, the presentation of live Christmas musical productions; Entertainment, namely, live music concerts; Entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical band; Entertainment, namely, live performances by musical bands; Hosting a back to school event in a shopping center featuring prizes, games, music, and a fashion show; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; Music composition and transcription for others; Music composition for others; Music production services; Music publishing services; Music selection services for use in TV, film, radio and video games; Music transcription for others; Music-halls; Planning arrangement of showing movies, shows, plays or musical performances; Post-production editing services in the field of music, videos and films; Presentation of musical performance; Production of sound and music video recordings; Providing facilities for movies, shows, plays, music or educational training; Providing ratings for television, movie, music, video and video game content; Publication of musical texts; Rental of musical instruments; Rental of phonographic and music recordings; Theatrical and musical floor shows provided at discotheques and nightclubs; Theatrical and musical floor shows provided at performance venues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |