USPTO serial 77463372
EPICENTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3830008Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EPICENTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PREGNY-CHAMBESY, CH
PREGNY-CHAMBESY, CH
MILANO, IT
Milano, IT
Milano, IT
Milano, IT
Milano, IT
Milano, IT
Milano, IT
MILANO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PACKAGE COMPRISED OF MIDDLEWARE IN THE NATURE OF SOFTWARE COMPONENTS CONSISTING OF SOURCE CODE COMPILED AND EXECUTABLE OBJECT CODE AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR USE IN DELIVERING MULTIMEDIA CONTENT, DATA NETWORKING, PERSON-TO-PERSON COMMUNICATION, NAMELY, COMPUTER TELEPHONY SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATION FOR INSTANT MESSAGING AND VIDEO CONFERENCING, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, USE AS A SPREADSHEET, WORD PROCESSING FOR HEALTH-CARE IN THE FIELD OF TELE-MEDICINE AND WELLNESS PROGRAMS, DOMOTICS, NAMELY, HOME AND OFFICE AUTOMATION SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, USE AS A SPREADSHEET, WORD PROCESSING, FOR HOME AND OFFICE MONITORING, FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, USE AS A SPREADSHEET, WORD PROCESSING, FOR CONTROL APPLICATIONS, AND FOR NETWORK STORAGE OF DATA AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, USE AS A SPREADSHEET, WORD PROCESSING FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, SOLD EMBEDDED IN AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT PART OF MULTIMEDIA END USER INTERNET PROTOCOL SET TOP BOXES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED DIGITAL BROADCAST SA
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED DIGITAL BROADCAST SA
- Other trademarks owned by ADB BROADBAND S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Pirelli & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Pirelli & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Pirelli & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Pirelli & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Pirelli & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Pirelli & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ADB BROADBAND S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EPICENTRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |