Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77463699?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77463699. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PROGRESSION IS INEVITABLE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77463699, the listed owner(s) include: Powdr - Copper Mountain LLC, Copper Mountain, Inc., Copper Mountain, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 77463699?

Serial number 77463699 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PROGRESSION IS INEVITABLE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PROGRESSION IS INEVITABLE?

PROGRESSION IS INEVITABLE (77463699) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover PROGRESSION IS INEVITABLE?

The public record lists International Classes: 025, 028, 035, 037, 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77463699

PROGRESSION IS INEVITABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: May 1, 2008
Status date: Aug 8, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: RHIM, ANDREW
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRESSION IS INEVITABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Powdr - Copper Mountain LLC
Park City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Powdr - Copper Mountain LLC
Copper Mountain, Inc.
Copper Mountain, CO
Other trademarks owned by Copper Mountain, Inc.
Copper Mountain, Inc.
Copper Mountain, CO
Other trademarks owned by Copper Mountain, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Rick Tache

J. Rick Tache Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.600 Anton BoulevardSuite 1400Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
025	Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, vests, shoes, bandanas, headbands, socks, gloves, underwear, hats, caps, and beanies	ACTIVE	—
028	Sports equipment and accessories, namely, snowboards, snowboard bindings, snowboard bags; skis, ski bindings and parts therefor	ACTIVE	—
035	Retail store services featuring skiing and snowboarding gear and equipment, clothing, clothing accessories, and gifts	ACTIVE	—
037	Maintenance and repair of skis, snowboards, boots, and related equipment; maintenance service program for skis, snowboards, boots and related equipment	ACTIVE	—
041	Providing recreational and entertainment services and facilities therefor, namely, ski resorts; providing instruction in various outdoor sports, namely, skiing, snowboarding, skateboarding, inline skating, and BMX bicycling; rental of ski, snowboarding, and other related equipment; organizing and conducting ski, snowboarding, skateboarding and BMX competitions	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 19, 2015	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Aug 8, 2011	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2011	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2011	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED	—
Jan 18, 2011	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Jan 14, 2011	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Jan 3, 2011	INCE	ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST	—
Dec 9, 2010	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Dec 9, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2010	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED	—
Aug 2, 2010	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Aug 2, 2010	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Jul 1, 2010	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Jul 1, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2010	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2010	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jan 21, 2010	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Jan 6, 2010	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Jan 6, 2010	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Jan 6, 2010	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2010	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Dec 30, 2009	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2009	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jul 7, 2009	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2009	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Mar 9, 2009	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Mar 9, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Mar 9, 2009	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Mar 6, 2009	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Mar 6, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 6, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 6, 2009	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jan 8, 2009	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jan 8, 2009	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2009	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 11, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 11, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 6, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—