USPTO serial 77463832
ILLUMINATE HOPE ATTORNEY STEVEN PEREZ REQUESTED BETTER RESOLUTION IMAGES. SEE ATTACHED. "THE SUBSTITUTE SPECIMEN WAS IN USE IN COMMERCE PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE DEADLINE FOR FILING THE STATEMENT OF USE."
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILLUMINATE HOPE ATTORNEY STEVEN PEREZ REQUESTED BETTER RESOLUTION IMAGES. SEE ATTACHED. "THE SUBSTITUTE SPECIMEN WAS IN USE IN COMMERCE PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE DEADLINE FOR FILING THE STATEMENT OF USE."?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Posters; Posters made of paper; Printed award certificates; Printed awards; Printed calendars; Printed certificates; Printed certificates for sports and/or entertainment fans; Printed certificates in the field of sports and/or entertainment; Printed charts; Photographic prints; Pictorial prints; Printed emblems; Printed forms; Printed greeting cards with electronic information stored therein; Printed invitations; Printed lectures; Printed paper labels; Printed paper signs; Printed paper signs, namely, table tents; Printed patterns; Printed products, namely, menu boards; Printed tickets; Printing blocks; Printing paper; Prints | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 2009 |
| 021 | Empty water bottles for bicycles | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2009 |
| 025 | Baby bibs not of paper; Boxer shorts; Camp shirts; Capri pants; Chef's hats; Children's and infants' cloth bibs; Children's cloth eating bibs; Cloth bibs; Cloth bibs for adult diners; Dress shirts; Golf shirts; Gym shorts; Hats; Headgear, namely, baseball caps, skull caps, cycling caps, running caps, golf caps, sweatbands; Hooded sweat shirts; Jogging pants; Knit shirts; Plastic baby bibs; Polo shirts; Shirts; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Shorts; Small hats; Sport shirts; Sports pants; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Stretch pants; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat shorts; T-shirts; Tee shirts; Toboggan hats, pants and caps; Triathlon clothing, namely, triathlon tights, triathlon shorts, triathlon singlets, triathlon shirts, triathlon suits; Waterproof jackets and pants; Wind pants; Wind shirts; Yoga pants; Yoga shirts | ACTIVE | May 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ride4US, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Ride4US, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ILLUMINATE HOPE ATTORNEY STEVEN PEREZ REQUESTED BETTER RESOLUTION IMAGES. SEE ATTACHED. "THE SUBSTITUTE SPECIMEN WAS IN USE IN COMMERCE PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE DEADLINE FOR FILING THE STATEMENT OF USE."
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |