USPTO serial 77463915
AUDIO BRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDIO BRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brockville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Smugler
JACK SMUGLER SMUGLERS LLP480 LISGAR STOTTAWA, ON, K1R5H3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, brochures about the goods and services of others, with electronic audio messages stored therein | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |