USPTO serial 77464094
CASCADIAN FARM ORGANIC FOUNDED IN SKAGIT VALLEY, WASHINGTON SINCE 1972
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3981846Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2011
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CASCADIAN FARM ORGANIC FOUNDED IN SKAGIT VALLEY, WASHINGTON SINCE 1972?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra M. Sepulveda
ALEXANDRA M. SEPULVEDA SMALL PLANET FOODS, INC.NUMBER ONE GENERAL MILLS BLVD.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | organic frozen vegetables; organic frozen potatoes; organic frozen fruits; organic fruit-based spreads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2008 |
| 030 | organic relish; processed cereal-based organic food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; organic grain-based snack bars and snacks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Small Planet Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Small Planet Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Small Planet Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CASCADIAN FARM ORGANIC FOUNDED IN SKAGIT VALLEY, WASHINGTON SINCE 1972
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |