Drawing for MICRO-GTL

USPTO serial 77464237

MICRO-GTL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MICRO-GTL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan F. Kaufman

Alan F. Kaufman McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP230 Park AvenueSuite 1700New York, NY 10169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001catalysts; catalysts for use in chemical processes; cracking catalysts for use in the oil refinery industry; cracking catalysts for use in the petroleum industriesACTIVE—
007(Section 1(b) basis) machines for producing liquid fuels, alkane fuels, renewable fuels and fuels for motor vehicles; oil, natural gas and methane processing equipmentACTIVE—
011chemical processing apparatus and installations; fluid processing apparatus and installations; apparatus for cleaning gases; apparatus for extracting gases; apparatus for filtering gases; apparatus for the purification of gases; gas recovery apparatus; installations for the collection of gases; installations for the separation of gases; reactors for gas-solid reactions; installations for the separation of liquids; installations for the treatment of liquids; installations for the collection of gases; installations for the collection of liquids; installations for chemical processing; reactors being industrial chemical installations; reactors for use in the chemical industry; reactors for use in the petrochemical industry; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
037construction, installation, assembly and maintenance of industrial installations; construction of installations and apparatus for analysis and synthesisACTIVE—
040chemical treatment of exhaust gases from fossil fuel combustion; recovery of hydrocarbons from gas; processing of hydrocarbon derivatives; processing of hydrocarbons; catalytic conversion of chemical compounds; petrochemical refining services; refining of petroleum products; processing of oil; treatment of liquids; chemical processing of liquids; refining of gas; chemical synthesis, being treatment of materialsACTIVE—
042provision of technical consultancy to the petrochemical industry; provision of technical consultancy to the oil refining industry; development, planning and design of installations and apparatus for analysis and synthesis; engineering, consulting and consultancy services relating to construction and/or operation of units for converting natural gas into synthetic petroleum products; information and advisory services relating to the aforesaidACTIVE—
045licensing and exploitation of intellectual propertyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 31, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 30, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 29, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 28, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance