CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LET'S BE REAL

USPTO serial 77464295

LET'S BE REAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LET'S BE REAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc E. Miller

MARC E. MILLER Watkinson Miller1100 New Jersey Ave. SE, Suite 910WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public awareness of the benefits of access to healthy foods, good nutrition practices, and phyisical activity in school settingsACTIVE—
041Education, entertainment, and training, namely, providing educational information, courses, training and entertainment relating to nutrition, health, and physical activity for children and adults, via classroom instruction, on-line instruction, interactive activities, digital media and gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 18, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 6, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 4, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 12, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance