Drawing for RUBBER DUCK

USPTO serial 77464296

RUBBER DUCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUBBER DUCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bassam N. Ibrahim

BASSAM N. IBRAHIM BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY, P.C.POST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025After ski boots; Ankle boots; Ankle socks; Athletic footwear; Beach footwear; Boots; Flip flops; Footwear for men and women; Sandals; Ski boots; Snow boots; Snowboard bootsACTIVEJun 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 31, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 31, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 8, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 7, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance