USPTO serial 77464726
MICRO-GROOVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICRO-GROOVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
MARY PAT WEYBACK DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | DENTAL FLOSS | ACTIVE | Jul 17, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |