USPTO serial 77464752
REEF EXCEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3801607Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2010
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REEF EXCEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody L. Factor
Jody L. Factor FACTOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LTD1327 W WASHINGTON BLVDSUITE 5G/HCHICAGO, IL 60607-1912Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Fertilizers for plants for aquariums and terrariums; ] chemical products for treatment of water in aquariums [ and for keeping fresh and preserving animal food, * the aforesaid excluding fish food; * ] chemical analysis kit for testing water in aquariums and ponds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | [ Antibiotic, antifungal, antimicrobial and antiparasitic veterinary preparations for aquatic animals, reptiles, lizards and snakes; ] dietetic substances in the nature of medicated sea-salt adapted for veterinary purposes [ ; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides; herbicides; disinfectants for use with aquariums and terrariums; vitamins and dietary food supplements for animals, * the aforesaid excluding fish food supplements * ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Electronic circuits for operating electric light sources used in aquariums and terrariums ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ Apparatus for the conditioning of water in an aquarium, namely, water conditioning units; water filtrations systems comprised of water filters for aquariums and ponds; electric light sources, namely, portable battery-operated lights that can be placed on surfaces where other light sources are unavailable; electric lamps; holders for fixing electric lamps and electric appliances sold as a unit and structural replacement parts therefor, all the aforementioned goods for use with aquariums and terrariums ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | [ Animal food for use in aquariums and terrariums ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TUNZE AQUARIENTECHNIK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by TUNZE AQUARIENTECHNIK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by TUNZE AQUARIENTECHNIK GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named REEF EXCEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |