Drawing for XTREME COUTURE

USPTO serial 77464760

XTREME COUTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XTREME COUTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet Robertson Kaufman

462 STEVENS AVE., STE. 310SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Vests; Sweat bands; Wrist bands; Sports bra; Headbands; Rash guards; Denim jackets; Denims; Athletic footwear; Footwear; Moisture-wicking sports pants; Moisture-wicking sports shirts; Underarm clothing shields; SocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 6, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 7, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2013TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 21, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 21, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance