USPTO serial 77465502
AL-RABIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AL-RABIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry, and game; meat extracts; jams, jellies, eggs; edible oils and fats; pickles; strawberry flavored milk, banana flavored milk, lowfat and regular milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, and sago extract from special palm tree, prepared coffee and coffee based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer, ale and porter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AL-RABIE SAUDI FOODS CO. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by AL-RABIE SAUDI FOODS CO. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named AL-RABIE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |