Drawing for AVIGO

USPTO serial 77465660

AVIGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVIGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia L. Werner

Patricia L. Werner Bryan Cave LP1290 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Non-metal and non-luminous roadway safety traffic conesACTIVE—
019Non-metal road signs, non-metal safety, caution and warning signs; Non-luminous, non-mechanical children-at-play safety signs not of metal, non-metal children's safety gates, non-metal driveway gatesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 5, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 27, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 22, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 1, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 8, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 15, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance