USPTO serial 77466142
MARLEY COFFEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4187013Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2012
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARLEY COFFEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited
Nassau, BS
Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited
Nassau, BS
Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited
Nassau, BS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesse Saivar
Jesse Saivar Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP2049 Century Park EastSuite 2600Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring coffee, tea, beverageware, coffee makers, coffee grinders, and espresso makers, and beans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MARLEY COFFEE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2023 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |