USPTO serial 77466237
COAGUTRAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COAGUTRAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Windsor, NY
New Windsor, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel R. Frijouf
DANIEL R. FRIJOUF FRIJOUF, RUST & PYLE, P.A.201 EAST DAVIS BLVD.TAMPA, FL 33606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in managing patients on anticoagulation therapies | ABANDONED | Feb 14, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |