USPTO serial 77466692
ULTRASAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRASAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Surrey, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald O.S. Oyen
GERALD O.S. OYEN OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA LLP601 WEST CORDOVA STREETSUITE 480, THE STATIONVANCOUVER, B.C., V6B1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | water purification systems comprised of reverse osmosis units, ultraviolet purification units, ozonation units, cooling units and water holding tanks used, in series, to produce potable water and water purification installations, namely, water clarifying units, all for domestic and commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |