USPTO serial 77467505
HARDNOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3779933Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2010
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARDNOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, CA
Concord, CA
Concord, CA
Concord, CA
Concord, CA
Concord, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beverly Robin Green
BEVERLY ROBIN GREEN GREEN & GREEN1000 4TH ST STE 595SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901-3136UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical and vocal group; Entertainment in the nature of musical group live performances; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; Entertainment, namely, live music concerts; Entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical band; Presentation of live show performances; Presentation of musical performance; Disc jockeys for parties and special events | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 27, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kehoe, Daniel Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by Kehoe, Daniel Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by Kehoe, James Benjamin
- Other trademarks owned by Kehoe, James Benjamin
- Other trademarks owned by Kehoe, James Benjamin
- Other trademarks owned by Kehoe, Daniel Joseph
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HARDNOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |