Drawing for DESKTOP FIGHTER

USPTO serial 77467956

DESKTOP FIGHTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESKTOP FIGHTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher T. Dejardin

CHRISTOPHER T. DEJARDIN CASSAN MACLEAN307 GILMOUR STREETOTTAWA, ONTARIO, K2P0P7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, computer game softwareACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, hats, caps, sweaters, hooded sweat shirts and pantsACTIVE—
028Action figures and accessories therefor; toy figurines and accessories therefor, and dolls and accessories thereforACTIVE—
041Providing on-line computer games; matching players with other players for online computer game tournaments; on-line entertainment in the nature of computer game tournamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 12, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 22, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance